<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/search_rss">
  <title>English</title>
  <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org</link>

  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 191 to 205.
        
  </description>

  

  

  <image rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/59-hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map/hunting-grounds-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map/timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map/forest-resources-and-their-use-map"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map"/>
      
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/59-hunting-resources-map">
    <title>059. Hunting resources. Wild fowl map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/59-hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T01:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map">
    <title>Hunting resources. Squirrel and hare map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/e2a290cdf91246f7ba5244c4422504fd/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__58_Huntingresources.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Game animals</strong></p>
<p>The resource potential of game animals of the Baikal basin has long been characterized by the abundance and high species diversity. This is due to the location of the territory at the intersection of Central-Asian, European-Siberian and East-Asian faunas, where representatives of all of these complexes, including species valuable for hunting, are found. Within the region, there are four typological landscape complexes, corresponding to the zonal and regional landscape subdivisions, namely: mountain-taiga, goletz, forest-steppe, and steppe. Each of them is characterized by a set of habitat types, the quality and quantity of which influence the number of animals.</p>
<p>The wildlife of the <b><i>mountain taiga </i></b>is the richest and most diverse; there manifestations of latitudinal zonality in the distribution of vegetation are complicated by the features of altitudinal zonality of its location in the mountains depending on the steepness and exposure of slopes. This creates prerequisites to spread the spectrum of landscape-ecological diversity of the conditions of animal habitats, and possibilities for most of them to choose the most valuable biotopes and, eventually, to increase in the number. In the mountain taiga squirrel, hazel grouse, sable, bear, and in some places musk deer are numerous. Siberian stag and roe deer inhabiting light slopes, forest openings and woodlots, as well as elk, inhabiting waterlogged intermountain depressions, creek valleys and wide plots of terraces in the coastal area of Lake Baikal, are common. Wolf is numerous in some places; wood grouse and fox are common; lynx and wolverine are less common. Unique populations of reindeer and black-capped marmot survived in high-mountain belts of ridges on both sides of Lake Baikal thanks to the good protection.</p>
<p>Nerpa (Baikal seal) occupies a special place, being the only representative of the family of pinnipeds on Lake Baikal. Its largest rookery is located on the Malye Ushkanyi Islands.</p>
<p>The <b><i>goletz complex</i></b> is characterized by a significantly lower abundance of game animals. Willow and rock ptarmigan, reindeer and ermine belong to permanent residents. This complex can be roughly considered a complementing link to the mountain-taiga one since so many game animals, especially the ungulates, as well as bear, are connected with the highlands by systematic seasonal migrations.</p>
<p>The <b><i>forest-steppe and steppe complexes</i></b> stretch in narrow discontinuous bands in the south of the region. They are represented by the Central-Asian mountain steppes and are not distinguished by the abundance of game animals. Only roe deer in the forest-steppe continues to hold the background position among other species, while tarbagan, once numerous in the steppe, has lost its former significance as a result of plowing of the Transbaikalian steppes and its extermination as a carrier of epizootic plague in the course of antiplague measures. Other species characteristic of the forest-steppe zone, namely, badger and raccoon dog, and of the steppe zone, namely, tolai hare, manul, and dzeren, are small in number. Some of them (dzeren and manul) are protected.</p>
<p>The status of game animals is examined only for the Russian part of the Baikal basin. In connection with the reorganizational measures in the Russian hunting sector over the past two decades, some negative manifestations can be noticed in the usage patterns of species valuable for hunting and in the dynamics of their numbers. A number of problems arose, connected mainly with wild ungulates, especially Siberian stag, roe deer, elk, wild reindeer, and in some places musk deer. Concerning these species ​​an undisputed conclusion was made (as, indeed, for other regions) that “the current dynamics of populations of wild ungulates in Russia is determined mainly by hunters (poachers to a greater extent), large predators, and, locally, snowy winters, and not by a natural cyclicity and changes in the productivity of phytocenoses” [Kozhichev, 2002; Danilkin, 2010].</p>
<p>Among large predators the greatest harm is done by wolves. The wolf problem arose due to the loosening of its control. The damage from this predator to the ungulates (Siberian stag and, especially, roe deer) in different regions of Buryatia reaches 8-30% of the autumn herd [Noskov, 2008]. In recent years, in consequence of the irregular decrease in the number of Siberian stag (poaching and death by predators) in conjunction with the legal shooting in Buryatia a crisis situation with the population of this deer was created [Noskov, 2008]. The damage from wolves only in Transbaikalia in 2011 amounted to11.6 million roubles to agriculture and 70-80 million rubles to hunting [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013]. Because of the large number of wolves in some areas of Transbaikalia an emergency situation was declared [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013].</p>
<p>In the current situation, the negative effects are smoothed out to some extent through a network of specially protected natural areas. Thus, in Buryatia, 7-8% of the total number of Siberian stag and roe deer are protected within the territories of 13 nature reserves (zakazniks) and 3 reserved areas (zapovedniks) [Noskov, 2008]. Reindeer is listed in the Red Book of the Republic of Buryatia. Measures to protect the hunting grounds, especially in the areas of concentration of animals, are taken.</p>
<p>Another situation formed with respect to fur-bearing species of hunting. This is due to the fall in world prices for raw fur. Eighteen million pelts of caged mink from China were mass-marketed [Romanov, 2008]. Because of low prices for Chinese mink, squirrel or muskrat fur coats turned out to be more expensive. As a result, squirrel and muskrat are in little demand on the market. The same situation takes place with other species, namely: fox, Siberian weasel, and ermine. Rare lynx and wolverine pelts are used mainly on the domestic market.</p>
<p>A diametrically opposite situation is with sable enabling Russia to achieve a dominant position in the world market as an exclusive supplier of sable fur. Demand and prices for sable pelts have increased. The price for a sable at an auction averages 220-250 dollars. As opposed to the past years, sable is not endangered as there are less professional hunters. Besides, remote hunting lands are not utilized. They have become a kind of sable reserves, where sables multiply and settle throughout the taiga.</p>
<p>The analysis of the status of hunting fauna in the Baikal basin revealed a number of trends in the features of its use, also characteristic of other regions of the country, in particular, the problem of protecting ungulates. A positive phenomenon is a continued status of sable as the leader in the world fur market, and a removal of the danger of its extermination due to changes in socio-economic conditions, which is important in contrast with previous years.</p>
<p>At the same time, unlike the majority of Siberian regions where a trend of rapid increase in the area of publicly available lands accelerated, in the region under consideration this phenomenon is minimized. This is indicative of targeted optimization of the utilization of game animals resources on the basis of improving forms of hunting management and prospects of its development in the region. Thus, the calculations [Dambiev et al., 2011] made it possible to estimate the socio-economic significance of hunting nature management in the Republic of Buryatia in 2010 as amounting to 1.1 billion roubles. Among them natural products of hunting (furs, meat, etc.) are estimated at 150 million roubles, while the social impact of tourism associated with hunting reaches 450 million roubles. The remaining portion is accounted for by other socio-economic relevance. Therefore, the current state of game fauna in the study region is characterized as conditionally stable. As a result of satisfactory organization of protection of game animals in the region, their number corresponds to a primitive stage of market hunting management.<b></b></p>
<p align="center">References</p>
<p>Dambiev, A.G., Kambalin, V.S., and Noskov, V.T. (2011). <i>Hunting nature management of the Republic of Buryatia: problems and prospects.</i> Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi  selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii. - 109 p.</p>
<p>Danilkin, A. (2010). <i>Wild ungulates of Russia: patterns of population dynamics, in Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, no.10, pp. 1-4.</p>
<p>Kozhichev, R. (2002). Siberian roe deer in Irkutsk oblast: what to do? in <i>Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, , no. 12, pp. 4-5.</p>
<p>Noskov, V.T. (2008). <i>Game animals of Buryatia</i>. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo FGOU VP. “BGSKhA” im. V.V. Filippova, , 223 p.</p>
<p>Romanov, V.I. (2008). Organizational obstacles for producing hunting fur in Eastern Siberia in Protection and sustainable use of animal and plant resources. <i>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, May, 29 – June, 1, 2008</i>. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii, pp. 134-136.</p>
<p>Samoilov, E.B. and Kayukova, S.N. (2013). <i>Invasion of wolves in Transbaikalia</i>.  Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGSKhA, pp. 261-263.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T01:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map">
    <title>058. Hunting resources. Squirrel and hare map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/58-hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T01:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map">
    <title>Hunting resources. Fur-bearing animals map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/cda03ffdcb44441cb11554ce5d32cbfd/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p>Open full size</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Game animals</strong></p>
<p>The resource potential of game animals of the Baikal basin has long been characterized by the abundance and high species diversity. This is due to the location of the territory at the intersection of Central-Asian, European-Siberian and East-Asian faunas, where representatives of all of these complexes, including species valuable for hunting, are found. Within the region, there are four typological landscape complexes, corresponding to the zonal and regional landscape subdivisions, namely: mountain-taiga, goletz, forest-steppe, and steppe. Each of them is characterized by a set of habitat types, the quality and quantity of which influence the number of animals.</p>
<p>The wildlife of the <b><i>mountain taiga </i></b>is the richest and most diverse; there manifestations of latitudinal zonality in the distribution of vegetation are complicated by the features of altitudinal zonality of its location in the mountains depending on the steepness and exposure of slopes. This creates prerequisites to spread the spectrum of landscape-ecological diversity of the conditions of animal habitats, and possibilities for most of them to choose the most valuable biotopes and, eventually, to increase in the number. In the mountain taiga squirrel, hazel grouse, sable, bear, and in some places musk deer are numerous. Siberian stag and roe deer inhabiting light slopes, forest openings and woodlots, as well as elk, inhabiting waterlogged intermountain depressions, creek valleys and wide plots of terraces in the coastal area of Lake Baikal, are common. Wolf is numerous in some places; wood grouse and fox are common; lynx and wolverine are less common. Unique populations of reindeer and black-capped marmot survived in high-mountain belts of ridges on both sides of Lake Baikal thanks to the good protection.</p>
<p>Nerpa (Baikal seal) occupies a special place, being the only representative of the family of pinnipeds on Lake Baikal. Its largest rookery is located on the Malye Ushkanyi Islands.</p>
<p>The <b><i>goletz complex</i></b> is characterized by a significantly lower abundance of game animals. Willow and rock ptarmigan, reindeer and ermine belong to permanent residents. This complex can be roughly considered a complementing link to the mountain-taiga one since so many game animals, especially the ungulates, as well as bear, are connected with the highlands by systematic seasonal migrations.</p>
<p>The <b><i>forest-steppe and steppe complexes</i></b> stretch in narrow discontinuous bands in the south of the region. They are represented by the Central-Asian mountain steppes and are not distinguished by the abundance of game animals. Only roe deer in the forest-steppe continues to hold the background position among other species, while tarbagan, once numerous in the steppe, has lost its former significance as a result of plowing of the Transbaikalian steppes and its extermination as a carrier of epizootic plague in the course of antiplague measures. Other species characteristic of the forest-steppe zone, namely, badger and raccoon dog, and of the steppe zone, namely, tolai hare, manul, and dzeren, are small in number. Some of them (dzeren and manul) are protected.</p>
<p>The status of game animals is examined only for the Russian part of the Baikal basin. In connection with the reorganizational measures in the Russian hunting sector over the past two decades, some negative manifestations can be noticed in the usage patterns of species valuable for hunting and in the dynamics of their numbers. A number of problems arose, connected mainly with wild ungulates, especially Siberian stag, roe deer, elk, wild reindeer, and in some places musk deer. Concerning these species ​​an undisputed conclusion was made (as, indeed, for other regions) that “the current dynamics of populations of wild ungulates in Russia is determined mainly by hunters (poachers to a greater extent), large predators, and, locally, snowy winters, and not by a natural cyclicity and changes in the productivity of phytocenoses” [Kozhichev, 2002; Danilkin, 2010].</p>
<p>Among large predators the greatest harm is done by wolves. The wolf problem arose due to the loosening of its control. The damage from this predator to the ungulates (Siberian stag and, especially, roe deer) in different regions of Buryatia reaches 8-30% of the autumn herd [Noskov, 2008]. In recent years, in consequence of the irregular decrease in the number of Siberian stag (poaching and death by predators) in conjunction with the legal shooting in Buryatia a crisis situation with the population of this deer was created [Noskov, 2008]. The damage from wolves only in Transbaikalia in 2011 amounted to11.6 million roubles to agriculture and 70-80 million rubles to hunting [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013]. Because of the large number of wolves in some areas of Transbaikalia an emergency situation was declared [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013].</p>
<p>In the current situation, the negative effects are smoothed out to some extent through a network of specially protected natural areas. Thus, in Buryatia, 7-8% of the total number of Siberian stag and roe deer are protected within the territories of 13 nature reserves (zakazniks) and 3 reserved areas (zapovedniks) [Noskov, 2008]. Reindeer is listed in the Red Book of the Republic of Buryatia. Measures to protect the hunting grounds, especially in the areas of concentration of animals, are taken.</p>
<p>Another situation formed with respect to fur-bearing species of hunting. This is due to the fall in world prices for raw fur. Eighteen million pelts of caged mink from China were mass-marketed [Romanov, 2008]. Because of low prices for Chinese mink, squirrel or muskrat fur coats turned out to be more expensive. As a result, squirrel and muskrat are in little demand on the market. The same situation takes place with other species, namely: fox, Siberian weasel, and ermine. Rare lynx and wolverine pelts are used mainly on the domestic market.</p>
<p>A diametrically opposite situation is with sable enabling Russia to achieve a dominant position in the world market as an exclusive supplier of sable fur. Demand and prices for sable pelts have increased. The price for a sable at an auction averages 220-250 dollars. As opposed to the past years, sable is not endangered as there are less professional hunters. Besides, remote hunting lands are not utilized. They have become a kind of sable reserves, where sables multiply and settle throughout the taiga.</p>
<p>The analysis of the status of hunting fauna in the Baikal basin revealed a number of trends in the features of its use, also characteristic of other regions of the country, in particular, the problem of protecting ungulates. A positive phenomenon is a continued status of sable as the leader in the world fur market, and a removal of the danger of its extermination due to changes in socio-economic conditions, which is important in contrast with previous years.</p>
<p>At the same time, unlike the majority of Siberian regions where a trend of rapid increase in the area of publicly available lands accelerated, in the region under consideration this phenomenon is minimized. This is indicative of targeted optimization of the utilization of game animals resources on the basis of improving forms of hunting management and prospects of its development in the region. Thus, the calculations [Dambiev et al., 2011] made it possible to estimate the socio-economic significance of hunting nature management in the Republic of Buryatia in 2010 as amounting to 1.1 billion roubles. Among them natural products of hunting (furs, meat, etc.) are estimated at 150 million roubles, while the social impact of tourism associated with hunting reaches 450 million roubles. The remaining portion is accounted for by other socio-economic relevance. Therefore, the current state of game fauna in the study region is characterized as conditionally stable. As a result of satisfactory organization of protection of game animals in the region, their number corresponds to a primitive stage of market hunting management.<b></b></p>
<p align="center">References</p>
<p>Dambiev, A.G., Kambalin, V.S., and Noskov, V.T. (2011). <i>Hunting nature management of the Republic of Buryatia: problems and prospects.</i> Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi  selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii. - 109 p.</p>
<p>Danilkin, A. (2010). <i>Wild ungulates of Russia: patterns of population dynamics, in Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, no.10, pp. 1-4.</p>
<p>Kozhichev, R. (2002). Siberian roe deer in Irkutsk oblast: what to do? in <i>Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, , no. 12, pp. 4-5.</p>
<p>Noskov, V.T. (2008). <i>Game animals of Buryatia</i>. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo FGOU VP. “BGSKhA” im. V.V. Filippova, , 223 p.</p>
<p>Romanov, V.I. (2008). Organizational obstacles for producing hunting fur in Eastern Siberia in Protection and sustainable use of animal and plant resources. <i>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, May, 29 – June, 1, 2008</i>. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii, pp. 134-136.</p>
<p>Samoilov, E.B. and Kayukova, S.N. (2013). <i>Invasion of wolves in Transbaikalia</i>.  Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGSKhA, pp. 261-263.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T01:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map">
    <title>057. Hunting resources. Fur-bearing animals map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/57-hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T01:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map">
    <title>Hunting resources. Predators map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/6bc109a885774ac2aeb1d93c94b5b4ba/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__56_Huntingresources.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Game animals</strong></p>
<p>The resource potential of game animals of the Baikal basin has long been characterized by the abundance and high species diversity. This is due to the location of the territory at the intersection of Central-Asian, European-Siberian and East-Asian faunas, where representatives of all of these complexes, including species valuable for hunting, are found. Within the region, there are four typological landscape complexes, corresponding to the zonal and regional landscape subdivisions, namely: mountain-taiga, goletz, forest-steppe, and steppe. Each of them is characterized by a set of habitat types, the quality and quantity of which influence the number of animals.</p>
<p>The wildlife of the <b><i>mountain taiga </i></b>is the richest and most diverse; there manifestations of latitudinal zonality in the distribution of vegetation are complicated by the features of altitudinal zonality of its location in the mountains depending on the steepness and exposure of slopes. This creates prerequisites to spread the spectrum of landscape-ecological diversity of the conditions of animal habitats, and possibilities for most of them to choose the most valuable biotopes and, eventually, to increase in the number. In the mountain taiga squirrel, hazel grouse, sable, bear, and in some places musk deer are numerous. Siberian stag and roe deer inhabiting light slopes, forest openings and woodlots, as well as elk, inhabiting waterlogged intermountain depressions, creek valleys and wide plots of terraces in the coastal area of Lake Baikal, are common. Wolf is numerous in some places; wood grouse and fox are common; lynx and wolverine are less common. Unique populations of reindeer and black-capped marmot survived in high-mountain belts of ridges on both sides of Lake Baikal thanks to the good protection.</p>
<p>Nerpa (Baikal seal) occupies a special place, being the only representative of the family of pinnipeds on Lake Baikal. Its largest rookery is located on the Malye Ushkanyi Islands.</p>
<p>The <b><i>goletz complex</i></b> is characterized by a significantly lower abundance of game animals. Willow and rock ptarmigan, reindeer and ermine belong to permanent residents. This complex can be roughly considered a complementing link to the mountain-taiga one since so many game animals, especially the ungulates, as well as bear, are connected with the highlands by systematic seasonal migrations.</p>
<p>The <b><i>forest-steppe and steppe complexes</i></b> stretch in narrow discontinuous bands in the south of the region. They are represented by the Central-Asian mountain steppes and are not distinguished by the abundance of game animals. Only roe deer in the forest-steppe continues to hold the background position among other species, while tarbagan, once numerous in the steppe, has lost its former significance as a result of plowing of the Transbaikalian steppes and its extermination as a carrier of epizootic plague in the course of antiplague measures. Other species characteristic of the forest-steppe zone, namely, badger and raccoon dog, and of the steppe zone, namely, tolai hare, manul, and dzeren, are small in number. Some of them (dzeren and manul) are protected.</p>
<p>The status of game animals is examined only for the Russian part of the Baikal basin. In connection with the reorganizational measures in the Russian hunting sector over the past two decades, some negative manifestations can be noticed in the usage patterns of species valuable for hunting and in the dynamics of their numbers. A number of problems arose, connected mainly with wild ungulates, especially Siberian stag, roe deer, elk, wild reindeer, and in some places musk deer. Concerning these species ​​an undisputed conclusion was made (as, indeed, for other regions) that “the current dynamics of populations of wild ungulates in Russia is determined mainly by hunters (poachers to a greater extent), large predators, and, locally, snowy winters, and not by a natural cyclicity and changes in the productivity of phytocenoses” [Kozhichev, 2002; Danilkin, 2010].</p>
<p>Among large predators the greatest harm is done by wolves. The wolf problem arose due to the loosening of its control. The damage from this predator to the ungulates (Siberian stag and, especially, roe deer) in different regions of Buryatia reaches 8-30% of the autumn herd [Noskov, 2008]. In recent years, in consequence of the irregular decrease in the number of Siberian stag (poaching and death by predators) in conjunction with the legal shooting in Buryatia a crisis situation with the population of this deer was created [Noskov, 2008]. The damage from wolves only in Transbaikalia in 2011 amounted to11.6 million roubles to agriculture and 70-80 million rubles to hunting [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013]. Because of the large number of wolves in some areas of Transbaikalia an emergency situation was declared [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013].</p>
<p>In the current situation, the negative effects are smoothed out to some extent through a network of specially protected natural areas. Thus, in Buryatia, 7-8% of the total number of Siberian stag and roe deer are protected within the territories of 13 nature reserves (zakazniks) and 3 reserved areas (zapovedniks) [Noskov, 2008]. Reindeer is listed in the Red Book of the Republic of Buryatia. Measures to protect the hunting grounds, especially in the areas of concentration of animals, are taken.</p>
<p>Another situation formed with respect to fur-bearing species of hunting. This is due to the fall in world prices for raw fur. Eighteen million pelts of caged mink from China were mass-marketed [Romanov, 2008]. Because of low prices for Chinese mink, squirrel or muskrat fur coats turned out to be more expensive. As a result, squirrel and muskrat are in little demand on the market. The same situation takes place with other species, namely: fox, Siberian weasel, and ermine. Rare lynx and wolverine pelts are used mainly on the domestic market.</p>
<p>A diametrically opposite situation is with sable enabling Russia to achieve a dominant position in the world market as an exclusive supplier of sable fur. Demand and prices for sable pelts have increased. The price for a sable at an auction averages 220-250 dollars. As opposed to the past years, sable is not endangered as there are less professional hunters. Besides, remote hunting lands are not utilized. They have become a kind of sable reserves, where sables multiply and settle throughout the taiga.</p>
<p>The analysis of the status of hunting fauna in the Baikal basin revealed a number of trends in the features of its use, also characteristic of other regions of the country, in particular, the problem of protecting ungulates. A positive phenomenon is a continued status of sable as the leader in the world fur market, and a removal of the danger of its extermination due to changes in socio-economic conditions, which is important in contrast with previous years.</p>
<p>At the same time, unlike the majority of Siberian regions where a trend of rapid increase in the area of publicly available lands accelerated, in the region under consideration this phenomenon is minimized. This is indicative of targeted optimization of the utilization of game animals resources on the basis of improving forms of hunting management and prospects of its development in the region. Thus, the calculations [Dambiev et al., 2011] made it possible to estimate the socio-economic significance of hunting nature management in the Republic of Buryatia in 2010 as amounting to 1.1 billion roubles. Among them natural products of hunting (furs, meat, etc.) are estimated at 150 million roubles, while the social impact of tourism associated with hunting reaches 450 million roubles. The remaining portion is accounted for by other socio-economic relevance. Therefore, the current state of game fauna in the study region is characterized as conditionally stable. As a result of satisfactory organization of protection of game animals in the region, their number corresponds to a primitive stage of market hunting management.<b></b></p>
<p align="center">References</p>
<p>Dambiev, A.G., Kambalin, V.S., and Noskov, V.T. (2011). <i>Hunting nature management of the Republic of Buryatia: problems and prospects.</i> Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi  selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii. - 109 p.</p>
<p>Danilkin, A. (2010). <i>Wild ungulates of Russia: patterns of population dynamics, in Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, no.10, pp. 1-4.</p>
<p>Kozhichev, R. (2002). Siberian roe deer in Irkutsk oblast: what to do? in <i>Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, , no. 12, pp. 4-5.</p>
<p>Noskov, V.T. (2008). <i>Game animals of Buryatia</i>. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo FGOU VP. “BGSKhA” im. V.V. Filippova, , 223 p.</p>
<p>Romanov, V.I. (2008). Organizational obstacles for producing hunting fur in Eastern Siberia in Protection and sustainable use of animal and plant resources. <i>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, May, 29 – June, 1, 2008</i>. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii, pp. 134-136.</p>
<p>Samoilov, E.B. and Kayukova, S.N. (2013). <i>Invasion of wolves in Transbaikalia</i>.  Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGSKhA, pp. 261-263.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T00:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map">
    <title>056. Hunting resources. Predators map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/56-hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T00:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map">
    <title>Hunting resources. Ungulates map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map/hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/fdccdfaa5cb54a23bcd184d7e2c3ba88/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__55_Huntingresources.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Game animals</strong></p>
<p>The resource potential of game animals of the Baikal basin has long been characterized by the abundance and high species diversity. This is due to the location of the territory at the intersection of Central-Asian, European-Siberian and East-Asian faunas, where representatives of all of these complexes, including species valuable for hunting, are found. Within the region, there are four typological landscape complexes, corresponding to the zonal and regional landscape subdivisions, namely: mountain-taiga, goletz, forest-steppe, and steppe. Each of them is characterized by a set of habitat types, the quality and quantity of which influence the number of animals.</p>
<p>The wildlife of the <b><i>mountain taiga </i></b>is the richest and most diverse; there manifestations of latitudinal zonality in the distribution of vegetation are complicated by the features of altitudinal zonality of its location in the mountains depending on the steepness and exposure of slopes. This creates prerequisites to spread the spectrum of landscape-ecological diversity of the conditions of animal habitats, and possibilities for most of them to choose the most valuable biotopes and, eventually, to increase in the number. In the mountain taiga squirrel, hazel grouse, sable, bear, and in some places musk deer are numerous. Siberian stag and roe deer inhabiting light slopes, forest openings and woodlots, as well as elk, inhabiting waterlogged intermountain depressions, creek valleys and wide plots of terraces in the coastal area of Lake Baikal, are common. Wolf is numerous in some places; wood grouse and fox are common; lynx and wolverine are less common. Unique populations of reindeer and black-capped marmot survived in high-mountain belts of ridges on both sides of Lake Baikal thanks to the good protection.</p>
<p>Nerpa (Baikal seal) occupies a special place, being the only representative of the family of pinnipeds on Lake Baikal. Its largest rookery is located on the Malye Ushkanyi Islands.</p>
<p>The <b><i>goletz complex</i></b> is characterized by a significantly lower abundance of game animals. Willow and rock ptarmigan, reindeer and ermine belong to permanent residents. This complex can be roughly considered a complementing link to the mountain-taiga one since so many game animals, especially the ungulates, as well as bear, are connected with the highlands by systematic seasonal migrations.</p>
<p>The <b><i>forest-steppe and steppe complexes</i></b> stretch in narrow discontinuous bands in the south of the region. They are represented by the Central-Asian mountain steppes and are not distinguished by the abundance of game animals. Only roe deer in the forest-steppe continues to hold the background position among other species, while tarbagan, once numerous in the steppe, has lost its former significance as a result of plowing of the Transbaikalian steppes and its extermination as a carrier of epizootic plague in the course of antiplague measures. Other species characteristic of the forest-steppe zone, namely, badger and raccoon dog, and of the steppe zone, namely, tolai hare, manul, and dzeren, are small in number. Some of them (dzeren and manul) are protected.</p>
<p>The status of game animals is examined only for the Russian part of the Baikal basin. In connection with the reorganizational measures in the Russian hunting sector over the past two decades, some negative manifestations can be noticed in the usage patterns of species valuable for hunting and in the dynamics of their numbers. A number of problems arose, connected mainly with wild ungulates, especially Siberian stag, roe deer, elk, wild reindeer, and in some places musk deer. Concerning these species ​​an undisputed conclusion was made (as, indeed, for other regions) that “the current dynamics of populations of wild ungulates in Russia is determined mainly by hunters (poachers to a greater extent), large predators, and, locally, snowy winters, and not by a natural cyclicity and changes in the productivity of phytocenoses” [Kozhichev, 2002; Danilkin, 2010].</p>
<p>Among large predators the greatest harm is done by wolves. The wolf problem arose due to the loosening of its control. The damage from this predator to the ungulates (Siberian stag and, especially, roe deer) in different regions of Buryatia reaches 8-30% of the autumn herd [Noskov, 2008]. In recent years, in consequence of the irregular decrease in the number of Siberian stag (poaching and death by predators) in conjunction with the legal shooting in Buryatia a crisis situation with the population of this deer was created [Noskov, 2008]. The damage from wolves only in Transbaikalia in 2011 amounted to11.6 million roubles to agriculture and 70-80 million rubles to hunting [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013]. Because of the large number of wolves in some areas of Transbaikalia an emergency situation was declared [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013].</p>
<p>In the current situation, the negative effects are smoothed out to some extent through a network of specially protected natural areas. Thus, in Buryatia, 7-8% of the total number of Siberian stag and roe deer are protected within the territories of 13 nature reserves (zakazniks) and 3 reserved areas (zapovedniks) [Noskov, 2008]. Reindeer is listed in the Red Book of the Republic of Buryatia. Measures to protect the hunting grounds, especially in the areas of concentration of animals, are taken.</p>
<p>Another situation formed with respect to fur-bearing species of hunting. This is due to the fall in world prices for raw fur. Eighteen million pelts of caged mink from China were mass-marketed [Romanov, 2008]. Because of low prices for Chinese mink, squirrel or muskrat fur coats turned out to be more expensive. As a result, squirrel and muskrat are in little demand on the market. The same situation takes place with other species, namely: fox, Siberian weasel, and ermine. Rare lynx and wolverine pelts are used mainly on the domestic market.</p>
<p>A diametrically opposite situation is with sable enabling Russia to achieve a dominant position in the world market as an exclusive supplier of sable fur. Demand and prices for sable pelts have increased. The price for a sable at an auction averages 220-250 dollars. As opposed to the past years, sable is not endangered as there are less professional hunters. Besides, remote hunting lands are not utilized. They have become a kind of sable reserves, where sables multiply and settle throughout the taiga.</p>
<p>The analysis of the status of hunting fauna in the Baikal basin revealed a number of trends in the features of its use, also characteristic of other regions of the country, in particular, the problem of protecting ungulates. A positive phenomenon is a continued status of sable as the leader in the world fur market, and a removal of the danger of its extermination due to changes in socio-economic conditions, which is important in contrast with previous years.</p>
<p>At the same time, unlike the majority of Siberian regions where a trend of rapid increase in the area of publicly available lands accelerated, in the region under consideration this phenomenon is minimized. This is indicative of targeted optimization of the utilization of game animals resources on the basis of improving forms of hunting management and prospects of its development in the region. Thus, the calculations [Dambiev et al., 2011] made it possible to estimate the socio-economic significance of hunting nature management in the Republic of Buryatia in 2010 as amounting to 1.1 billion roubles. Among them natural products of hunting (furs, meat, etc.) are estimated at 150 million roubles, while the social impact of tourism associated with hunting reaches 450 million roubles. The remaining portion is accounted for by other socio-economic relevance. Therefore, the current state of game fauna in the study region is characterized as conditionally stable. As a result of satisfactory organization of protection of game animals in the region, their number corresponds to a primitive stage of market hunting management.<b></b></p>
<p align="center">References</p>
<p>Dambiev, A.G., Kambalin, V.S., and Noskov, V.T. (2011). <i>Hunting nature management of the Republic of Buryatia: problems and prospects.</i> Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi  selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii. - 109 p.</p>
<p>Danilkin, A. (2010). <i>Wild ungulates of Russia: patterns of population dynamics, in Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, no.10, pp. 1-4.</p>
<p>Kozhichev, R. (2002). Siberian roe deer in Irkutsk oblast: what to do? in <i>Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, , no. 12, pp. 4-5.</p>
<p>Noskov, V.T. (2008). <i>Game animals of Buryatia</i>. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo FGOU VP. “BGSKhA” im. V.V. Filippova, , 223 p.</p>
<p>Romanov, V.I. (2008). Organizational obstacles for producing hunting fur in Eastern Siberia in Protection and sustainable use of animal and plant resources. <i>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, May, 29 – June, 1, 2008</i>. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii, pp. 134-136.</p>
<p>Samoilov, E.B. and Kayukova, S.N. (2013). <i>Invasion of wolves in Transbaikalia</i>.  Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGSKhA, pp. 261-263.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T08:15:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map/hunting-grounds-map">
    <title>Hunting grounds map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map/hunting-grounds-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/b8bb8a5c50214c8c82bf7977bf74be84/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__54_HuntingGrounds.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Game animals</strong></p>
<p>The resource potential of game animals of the Baikal basin has long been characterized by the abundance and high species diversity. This is due to the location of the territory at the intersection of Central-Asian, European-Siberian and East-Asian faunas, where representatives of all of these complexes, including species valuable for hunting, are found. Within the region, there are four typological landscape complexes, corresponding to the zonal and regional landscape subdivisions, namely: mountain-taiga, goletz, forest-steppe, and steppe. Each of them is characterized by a set of habitat types, the quality and quantity of which influence the number of animals.</p>
<p>The wildlife of the <b><i>mountain taiga </i></b>is the richest and most diverse; there manifestations of latitudinal zonality in the distribution of vegetation are complicated by the features of altitudinal zonality of its location in the mountains depending on the steepness and exposure of slopes. This creates prerequisites to spread the spectrum of landscape-ecological diversity of the conditions of animal habitats, and possibilities for most of them to choose the most valuable biotopes and, eventually, to increase in the number. In the mountain taiga squirrel, hazel grouse, sable, bear, and in some places musk deer are numerous. Siberian stag and roe deer inhabiting light slopes, forest openings and woodlots, as well as elk, inhabiting waterlogged intermountain depressions, creek valleys and wide plots of terraces in the coastal area of Lake Baikal, are common. Wolf is numerous in some places; wood grouse and fox are common; lynx and wolverine are less common. Unique populations of reindeer and black-capped marmot survived in high-mountain belts of ridges on both sides of Lake Baikal thanks to the good protection.</p>
<p>Nerpa (Baikal seal) occupies a special place, being the only representative of the family of pinnipeds on Lake Baikal. Its largest rookery is located on the Malye Ushkanyi Islands.</p>
<p>The <b><i>goletz complex</i></b> is characterized by a significantly lower abundance of game animals. Willow and rock ptarmigan, reindeer and ermine belong to permanent residents. This complex can be roughly considered a complementing link to the mountain-taiga one since so many game animals, especially the ungulates, as well as bear, are connected with the highlands by systematic seasonal migrations.</p>
<p>The <b><i>forest-steppe and steppe complexes</i></b> stretch in narrow discontinuous bands in the south of the region. They are represented by the Central-Asian mountain steppes and are not distinguished by the abundance of game animals. Only roe deer in the forest-steppe continues to hold the background position among other species, while tarbagan, once numerous in the steppe, has lost its former significance as a result of plowing of the Transbaikalian steppes and its extermination as a carrier of epizootic plague in the course of antiplague measures. Other species characteristic of the forest-steppe zone, namely, badger and raccoon dog, and of the steppe zone, namely, tolai hare, manul, and dzeren, are small in number. Some of them (dzeren and manul) are protected.</p>
<p>The status of game animals is examined only for the Russian part of the Baikal basin. In connection with the reorganizational measures in the Russian hunting sector over the past two decades, some negative manifestations can be noticed in the usage patterns of species valuable for hunting and in the dynamics of their numbers. A number of problems arose, connected mainly with wild ungulates, especially Siberian stag, roe deer, elk, wild reindeer, and in some places musk deer. Concerning these species ​​an undisputed conclusion was made (as, indeed, for other regions) that “the current dynamics of populations of wild ungulates in Russia is determined mainly by hunters (poachers to a greater extent), large predators, and, locally, snowy winters, and not by a natural cyclicity and changes in the productivity of phytocenoses” [Kozhichev, 2002; Danilkin, 2010].</p>
<p>Among large predators the greatest harm is done by wolves. The wolf problem arose due to the loosening of its control. The damage from this predator to the ungulates (Siberian stag and, especially, roe deer) in different regions of Buryatia reaches 8-30% of the autumn herd [Noskov, 2008]. In recent years, in consequence of the irregular decrease in the number of Siberian stag (poaching and death by predators) in conjunction with the legal shooting in Buryatia a crisis situation with the population of this deer was created [Noskov, 2008]. The damage from wolves only in Transbaikalia in 2011 amounted to11.6 million roubles to agriculture and 70-80 million rubles to hunting [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013]. Because of the large number of wolves in some areas of Transbaikalia an emergency situation was declared [Samoilov, Kayukova, 2013].</p>
<p>In the current situation, the negative effects are smoothed out to some extent through a network of specially protected natural areas. Thus, in Buryatia, 7-8% of the total number of Siberian stag and roe deer are protected within the territories of 13 nature reserves (zakazniks) and 3 reserved areas (zapovedniks) [Noskov, 2008]. Reindeer is listed in the Red Book of the Republic of Buryatia. Measures to protect the hunting grounds, especially in the areas of concentration of animals, are taken.</p>
<p>Another situation formed with respect to fur-bearing species of hunting. This is due to the fall in world prices for raw fur. Eighteen million pelts of caged mink from China were mass-marketed [Romanov, 2008]. Because of low prices for Chinese mink, squirrel or muskrat fur coats turned out to be more expensive. As a result, squirrel and muskrat are in little demand on the market. The same situation takes place with other species, namely: fox, Siberian weasel, and ermine. Rare lynx and wolverine pelts are used mainly on the domestic market.</p>
<p>A diametrically opposite situation is with sable enabling Russia to achieve a dominant position in the world market as an exclusive supplier of sable fur. Demand and prices for sable pelts have increased. The price for a sable at an auction averages 220-250 dollars. As opposed to the past years, sable is not endangered as there are less professional hunters. Besides, remote hunting lands are not utilized. They have become a kind of sable reserves, where sables multiply and settle throughout the taiga.</p>
<p>The analysis of the status of hunting fauna in the Baikal basin revealed a number of trends in the features of its use, also characteristic of other regions of the country, in particular, the problem of protecting ungulates. A positive phenomenon is a continued status of sable as the leader in the world fur market, and a removal of the danger of its extermination due to changes in socio-economic conditions, which is important in contrast with previous years.</p>
<p>At the same time, unlike the majority of Siberian regions where a trend of rapid increase in the area of publicly available lands accelerated, in the region under consideration this phenomenon is minimized. This is indicative of targeted optimization of the utilization of game animals resources on the basis of improving forms of hunting management and prospects of its development in the region. Thus, the calculations [Dambiev et al., 2011] made it possible to estimate the socio-economic significance of hunting nature management in the Republic of Buryatia in 2010 as amounting to 1.1 billion roubles. Among them natural products of hunting (furs, meat, etc.) are estimated at 150 million roubles, while the social impact of tourism associated with hunting reaches 450 million roubles. The remaining portion is accounted for by other socio-economic relevance. Therefore, the current state of game fauna in the study region is characterized as conditionally stable. As a result of satisfactory organization of protection of game animals in the region, their number corresponds to a primitive stage of market hunting management.<b></b></p>
<p align="center">References</p>
<p>Dambiev, A.G., Kambalin, V.S., and Noskov, V.T. (2011). <i>Hunting nature management of the Republic of Buryatia: problems and prospects.</i> Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi  selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii. - 109 p.</p>
<p>Danilkin, A. (2010). <i>Wild ungulates of Russia: patterns of population dynamics, in Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, no.10, pp. 1-4.</p>
<p>Kozhichev, R. (2002). Siberian roe deer in Irkutsk oblast: what to do? in <i>Okhota i okhotnichie khozyaistvo</i>, , no. 12, pp. 4-5.</p>
<p>Noskov, V.T. (2008). <i>Game animals of Buryatia</i>. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo FGOU VP. “BGSKhA” im. V.V. Filippova, , 223 p.</p>
<p>Romanov, V.I. (2008). Organizational obstacles for producing hunting fur in Eastern Siberia in Protection and sustainable use of animal and plant resources. <i>Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, May, 29 – June, 1, 2008</i>. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskoi selskokhozyaistvennoi akademii, pp. 134-136.</p>
<p>Samoilov, E.B. and Kayukova, S.N. (2013). <i>Invasion of wolves in Transbaikalia</i>.  Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGSKhA, pp. 261-263.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map">
    <title>055. Hunting resources. Ungulates map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/55-hunting-resources-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map">
    <title>054. Hunting grounds map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/54-hunting-grounds-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map/timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map">
    <title>Timber stock of the main groups of forest forming tree species map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map/timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/6c9a45dca85f4516a5d1ce01853851c3/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__53_TimberStockoftheMainGroupsofForestFormingTreeSpecies.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Forest resources and their use</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The Baikal basin is a truly enormous treasury of "green gold." As of January 1, 2011 the forest area is 32103.6 thousand hectares in the Russian part of the basin and 10354.3 thousand hectares in Mongolia. Total timber reserves in the Russian part of the basin are 2,795,800,000 m3, with a stock of the conifers 2.443.000.000 m<sup>3</sup> (87.4 %). In Mongolia the total timber reserves is 1.373.100.000 m<sup>3</sup>.</p>
<p>The basic map shows the forests of nature conservation and other preservation patterns, as well as merchantable and other forests, suitable for commercial use, and reserved forests. It should be said that the division of forest lands into protected, merchantable and reserved is characteristic only of the Russian Federation. However, in the territory of Mongolia forests of special importance and in need of protection are distinguished, such as forest areas up to 100 hectares, forests on the slopes of the mountain areas of more than 30 degrees, etc.</p>
<p>Protected forests in Russia include forests subject to reclamation in order to maintain environmental, water protection, safety, sanitation, health and other useful features while using these forests providing compatibility with their intended purpose. Within the Baikal basin there is a high proportion of protected forests, due their ecosystemic, environment protection and water protection functions, as well as the important ecological role of montane forests. Merchantable<b> </b>forests are those which should be developed for the purposes of sustainable, maximum-efficiency rate production of high quality wood and other forest resources, as well as their conversion products ensuring the preservation of beneficial functions of forests. As far as the reserved forests are concerned, those are the forests not planned for logging for next twenty years. These forests are mostly located in the northern part of the region, in the permafrost zone, off-road area and are unattractive for development.</p>
<p>The insert map "Timber reserves by groups of the major forest forming species" shows the average reserves of softwood and hardwood forests (m3) per hectare of land covered by them. The average stand of timber per unit of the covered area is one of the indicators characterizing the productivity of forests, depending on growing conditions of stands, their species, and stands sparsity. The average stand of conifers and deciduous trees per hectare in the Russian part of the Baikal basin is 132.5 m3 (the global average is 100 m3/ha ), and it is fluctuating from 79-82 m3/ha (mostly in the steppe regions of Zabaikalsky krai, the Republic of Buryatia (Zaigraevsky, Chita districts) to 160 -170 m3/ha and up in the mid- and north areas (Uletovsky district of Transbaikalia, Kabansky and Severobaikalsky districts of the Republic of Buryatia, Irkutsky and Slyudyansky districts of Irkutsk oblast). Within the Mongolian part of the basin the average reserve of coniferous and deciduous tree stands is 126.6 m3 per one hectare with fluctuations in the aimaks from 81 to 205 m3 per ha. The highest average stand of timber per unit of forest area is characteristic of the northern mountainous areas of Mongolia.</p>
<p>Also this map shows the distribution of the total stand of timber by major groups of forest forming species (in million m3) with the method of cartodiagram. This index demonstrates forest-resource security area, which varies significantly in the districts of the Russian part of the basin and Mongolian aimaks (from 1.5 to 481 million m3). For correct depiction of the amount of total stand of timber within municipalities a conventional stepped scale for the circular cartodiagram was worked out, which enables to judge about the stands of timber for each group using the percentage between the major groups of forest forming species (coniferous, deciduous and shrubs).</p>
<p>Forest use is determined by the activities that have priority development within the forest vegetation areas. Timber harvesting is most developed among all kinds of forest utilization in the Russian part of the Baikal basin regulated by allowable cutting rates. Forests are actively used for recreation, hunting activities, etc.</p>
<p>In the analysis of forest utilization the following trends for all forests of the Baikal basin are revealed in recent years. They are reduction of coniferous stands, mostly maturing and mature stands; replacement of coniferous species by deciduous ones; widespread illegal logging, reduction of forested area due to fires, forest damage by pests, deforestation, and insufficient reforestation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map">
    <title>053. Timber stock of the main groups of forest forming tree species map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/53-timber-stock-of-the-main-groups-of-forest-forming-tree-species-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map/forest-resources-and-their-use-map">
    <title>Forest resources and their use map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map/forest-resources-and-their-use-map</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img class="image-inline" src="../../../resolveuid/700ad65621bc487bbc5893966fe93356/@@images/image/preview" /></p>
<p><a href="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/photos/copy_of__52_Forestresourcesandtheiruse.png" class="internal-link">Open full size</a></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Forest resources and their use</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The Baikal basin is a truly enormous treasury of "green gold." As of January 1, 2011 the forest area is 32103.6 thousand hectares in the Russian part of the basin and 10354.3 thousand hectares in Mongolia. Total timber reserves in the Russian part of the basin are 2,795,800,000 m3, with a stock of the conifers 2.443.000.000 m<sup>3</sup> (87.4 %). In Mongolia the total timber reserves is 1.373.100.000 m<sup>3</sup>.</p>
<p>The basic map shows the forests of nature conservation and other preservation patterns, as well as merchantable and other forests, suitable for commercial use, and reserved forests. It should be said that the division of forest lands into protected, merchantable and reserved is characteristic only of the Russian Federation. However, in the territory of Mongolia forests of special importance and in need of protection are distinguished, such as forest areas up to 100 hectares, forests on the slopes of the mountain areas of more than 30 degrees, etc.</p>
<p>Protected forests in Russia include forests subject to reclamation in order to maintain environmental, water protection, safety, sanitation, health and other useful features while using these forests providing compatibility with their intended purpose. Within the Baikal basin there is a high proportion of protected forests, due their ecosystemic, environment protection and water protection functions, as well as the important ecological role of montane forests. Merchantable<b> </b>forests are those which should be developed for the purposes of sustainable, maximum-efficiency rate production of high quality wood and other forest resources, as well as their conversion products ensuring the preservation of beneficial functions of forests. As far as the reserved forests are concerned, those are the forests not planned for logging for next twenty years. These forests are mostly located in the northern part of the region, in the permafrost zone, off-road area and are unattractive for development.</p>
<p>The insert map "Timber reserves by groups of the major forest forming species" shows the average reserves of softwood and hardwood forests (m3) per hectare of land covered by them. The average stand of timber per unit of the covered area is one of the indicators characterizing the productivity of forests, depending on growing conditions of stands, their species, and stands sparsity. The average stand of conifers and deciduous trees per hectare in the Russian part of the Baikal basin is 132.5 m3 (the global average is 100 m3/ha ), and it is fluctuating from 79-82 m3/ha (mostly in the steppe regions of Zabaikalsky krai, the Republic of Buryatia (Zaigraevsky, Chita districts) to 160 -170 m3/ha and up in the mid- and north areas (Uletovsky district of Transbaikalia, Kabansky and Severobaikalsky districts of the Republic of Buryatia, Irkutsky and Slyudyansky districts of Irkutsk oblast). Within the Mongolian part of the basin the average reserve of coniferous and deciduous tree stands is 126.6 m3 per one hectare with fluctuations in the aimaks from 81 to 205 m3 per ha. The highest average stand of timber per unit of forest area is characteristic of the northern mountainous areas of Mongolia.</p>
<p>Also this map shows the distribution of the total stand of timber by major groups of forest forming species (in million m3) with the method of cartodiagram. This index demonstrates forest-resource security area, which varies significantly in the districts of the Russian part of the basin and Mongolian aimaks (from 1.5 to 481 million m3). For correct depiction of the amount of total stand of timber within municipalities a conventional stepped scale for the circular cartodiagram was worked out, which enables to judge about the stands of timber for each group using the percentage between the major groups of forest forming species (coniferous, deciduous and shrubs).</p>
<p>Forest use is determined by the activities that have priority development within the forest vegetation areas. Timber harvesting is most developed among all kinds of forest utilization in the Russian part of the Baikal basin regulated by allowable cutting rates. Forests are actively used for recreation, hunting activities, etc.</p>
<p>In the analysis of forest utilization the following trends for all forests of the Baikal basin are revealed in recent years. They are reduction of coniferous stands, mostly maturing and mature stands; replacement of coniferous species by deciduous ones; widespread illegal logging, reduction of forested area due to fires, forest damage by pests, deforestation, and insufficient reforestation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Page</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map">
    <title>052. Forest resources and their use map</title>
    <link>http://bic.iwlearn.org/en/atlas/atlas/52-forest-resources-and-their-use-map</link>
    <description></description>
    
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Ayurzhanaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T07:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Folder</dc:type>
  </item>




</rdf:RDF>
